UIArm I: Development of a Low-Cost and Modular 4-DOF Robotic Arm for Sorting Plastic Bottles from Waste Stream
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study presents the development of an accessible, reliable, 3D printable, low-cost, and modular 4 degrees-of-freedom robotic arm for the automated sorting of plastic bottles from the waste stream.The UIArm I robot arm was designed based on the modification of an open-source Thor Robot model using Free-CAD with the components 3D printed using PLA and PETG.The forward kinematics was obtained by Denavit-Hartenberg (DH) method, while the analytical method was used for the inverse kinematics.The electrical components include stepper motors, servo motors, motor drivers, a printed circuit board (PCB), an Arduino Mega microprocessor, a light source for illumination, and a PC with a webcam.Python was used for programming the PC and C# for the Arduino microprocessor.TensorFlow, an end-to-end open-source, machine learning platform was used to develop the object detection algorithm based on a deep neural network.The object detection model achieved an accuracy of 91% for Pepsi plastic bottles which formed the bulk of training images.Other types of plastic bottles were detected with an 85% accuracy.The study has demonstrated the viability of a locally developed robotic arm for the automated sorting of plastic bottles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it