MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361302094 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560104

Modeling, Optimization, and Techno-Economic Assessment of a Hybrid System Composed of Photovoltaic-Wind-Fuel Cell and Battery Bank

2023· article· en· W4361302094 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kamilia Boucenna, Toufik Sebbagh, Nedjem-Eddine Benchouia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemBattery (electricity)Fuel cellsWind powerAutomotive engineeringEnvironmental scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)Chemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Decentralized electricity production from renewable energy sources offers greater security of supply to consumers while respecting the environment.However, the random nature of these sources requires us to establish rules for the sizing and use of these systems in order to make the best use of them.Hybrid renewable energy sources can effectively meet the electric energy needs of the University of Skikda's various structures.This study examines the financial viability of a hybrid renewable-based system that is off the grid and proposed to supply several campuses of the University of Skikda in Algeria with the electricity they need.In order to achieve this, HOMER software is used to optimize and simulate the system under consideration.The results obtained recommend using a system made up of a wind turbine, solar panels, a battery bank, and a fuel cell that can produce electricity at a levelized cost of 0.193 €/kWh.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207