MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361305104 · doi:10.30978/utj2023-1-5

Evaluation of the effects of ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate on cognitive function and clinical-functional status of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and ischemic heart disease

2023· article· en· W4361305104 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. A. Serik, О. М. Колесникова, A. Yu. Tokarіeva, I. V. Antonova

Bibliographic record

VenueUkrainian Therapeutical Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicInflammation biomarkers and pathways
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCOPDSpirometryDepression (economics)Physical therapyPulmonary function testingInternal medicineAnxietyAnthropometryHospital Anxiety and Depression ScalePulmonary diseaseDiseaseAsthmaPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective — to assess the effects of ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate on cognitive function and clinical and functional status of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and ischemic heart disease (IHD). Materials and methods. The study was conducted among outpatients at the clinic of the GI «L.T.Mala National Therapy Institute of NAMS of Ukraine». Examinations involved 67 patients with mean age 61.64±9.17 years. Among them, 27 were patients with COPD and IHD combination, 22 patients with isolated COPD, and 18 patients with isolated IHD. According to the study design, during telephone contact 6 months after the start of observation, all patients were administered the drug ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate 500 mg per day for 3 months. The evaluation of its effects on cognitive function in patients with COPD and IHD was carried at visit‑2 (after 12 months from the start of observation). All patients underwent general clinical examination, anthropometric measurements, calculation of body mass index, and spirometry before taking ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate (at visit‑1) and after three months of taking the drug (visit‑2). To verify the degree of dyspnea intensity, the following scales were used: five‑point scale Mediсal Research Council Dyspnea Scale in Fletcher’s modification (mMRC) and modified 10‑point Borg scale (Borg, 1982). Questionnaire САТ (COPD Assessment Test) was used to assess COPD effects on the well‑being and everyday life of the patient. Physical load tolerance was evaluated based on the 6‑minute walk test. To assess the cognitive status of patients, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scale (HADS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder test (GAD‑7), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were used. Results. In patients with COPD, both with concomitant IHD and without it, the manifestations of shortness of breath decreased and the tolerability of physical exertion improved against the background of administration ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate 500 mg per day for three months. Patients with isolated IHD demonstrated improved cognitive function and reduced depressive symptoms. The anxiety decrease was observed in patients with IHD with or without concomitant COPD. Conclusions. Ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate can be recommended to improve cognitive function in patients with COPD and IHD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUkrainian Therapeutical JournalSame topicInflammation biomarkers and pathwaysFrench-language works237,207