MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361306793 · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.181

Laser powder bed fusion of Alumina/Fe–Ni ceramic matrix particulate composites impregnated with a polymeric resin

2023· article· en· W4361306793 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Research and Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCeramicSinteringComposite materialMicrostructurePorosityFabricationComposite numberPolymerSelective laser sinteringVickers hardness test

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additive Manufacturing (AM) plays a key role in meeting the vital demands of Industry. The AM industry needs the range of applicable materials to be expanded by conducting research on novel ones. In the present investigation, alumina/Fe–Ni (steel) ceramic matrix particulate composite was fabricated employing laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing (AM) technology. The quality of the printed samples was associated with the LPBF process parameters, which were optimized for this process. In general, the fabricated samples showed a microstructure of alumina matrix with uniform distribution of steel (Fe–Ni) particles. The as-printed samples exhibited pores. Thus, they were subjected to a sintering heat treatment cycle under an inert atmosphere. Although the sintering cycle considerably increased the average Vickers hardness, pores were not eliminated entirely. Therefore, polymer impregnation of the as-sintered samples was carried out to reduce porosities and microcracks. The mercury porosimeter showed that the porosity decreased sequentially after sintering and polymer impregnation. In addition, mechanical investigations revealed that the polymer impregnation improved the compressive strength of the sintered samples (from 56 to 120 MPa). Alumina-based materials find wide applications in various fields, including the manufacturing of electronic components, cutting tools, biomedical implants, and catalyst converters, owing to their low density, high hardness, wear and corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility. This study presents a viable approach for the fabrication of these materials, with developed samples exhibiting promising properties. The study emphasizes the potential of additive manufacturing as an approach for the fabrication of ceramic matrix composites reinforced with metallic particulates in future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it