Herméneutique de la texture sociale : dialectique du texte en sociologie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose de développer la notion de texture sociale, en remontant d’abord à l’herméneutique de Dilthey pour montrer l’ambiguïté que trouve chez lui la place du texte dans le contexte de la compréhension et de l’interprétation de la vie sociale. L’élargissement de cette question du texte à la texture sociale est montré par la suite en relation à la question de l’interdit, comme tiers exclu/inclus que présentent les travaux de Pierre Legendre, et se présente ensuite dans l’interprétation sociologique selon les modalités de la narration et de la conceptualisation, définies avant tout comme mises en relation. Sont abordées à partir de là de façon critique les approches sociologiques de Margaret Archer et de Jeffrey C. Alexander, qui aident à situer comment une herméneutique de la vie sociale s’articule de manière dialectique aux textes. L’exemple du retissage des relations aux populations autochtones dans le contexte « postcolonial » canadien intervient alors pour indiquer comment fonctionne le rapport aux textes dans le cadre d’une herméneutique de la texture sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.044 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".