MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361769329 · doi:10.5736/jares.35.4_8

【日本不動産学会シンポジウム】 山岳国立公園管理の将来 (レクリエーション・登山のための利活用を探る)

2022· article· ja· W4361769329 on OpenAlexaff
太一 伊藤, 泰広 花谷, 基之 熊倉, 弥生 久末, 昌志 太田

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Japanese Journal of Real Estate Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

公益社団法人全日本不動産協会、公益財団法人日本賃貸住宅管理協会、 公益社団法人日本不動産鑑定士協会連合会、一般社団法人不動産協会、 一般社団法人不動産証券化協会、公益財団法人不動産流通推進センター、 一般社団法人不動産流通経営協会、一般財団法人民間都市開発推進機構 <プログラム> パネルディスカッション パネリスト:伊藤 太一(江戸川大学国立公園研究所客員教授) 花谷 泰広(登山家 First Ascent代表 甲斐駒ヶ岳七丈小屋管理者) 熊倉 基之(環境省自然環境局国立公園課長) 久末 弥生(大阪市立大学大学院都市経営研究科教授) コーディネーター:太田 昌志(千葉商科大学国際教養学部准教授) 山岳国立公園管理の将来 (レクリエーション・登山のための利活用を探る) 【日本不動産学会シンポジウム】 9 日本不動産学会誌/Vol.35No.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Japanese Journal of Real Estate SciencesSame topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207