A Semantic-Preserving Scheme to Trajectory Synthesis Using Differential Privacy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the ubiquity of Internet of Things, location-based service (LBS) providers have collected huge volumes of individuals’ trajectories, which are valuable for some applications, e.g., store location choosing for merchants. However, directly publishing raw trajectories to applications may violate individuals’ data privacy and lead to unexpected loss. Although many trajectory synthesis methods under differential privacy have been proposed to privately publish trajectories data, they cannot sufficiently preserve the semantic information of trajectories. Aiming at this issue, in this article, we introduce a semantic-preserving scheme to synthesize trajectories for publishing under differential privacy. Specifically, we first design a hierarchical graphical model (HGM) to capture the semantic feature of trajectories. Then, we propose a metric, named the correlation score, to measure the relationship between two locations, which can well capture the geographic feature of trajectories. After that, we propose a private trajectory synthesis algorithm by first adding Laplace noises to the extracted features and then synthesizing trajectories based on the noisy features and the Markov chain theory. Privacy analysis demonstrates that our scheme can protect the privacy of trajectories. In addition, performance evaluation illustrates that our synthetic trajectories maintain good utility semantically and geographically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".