MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361798894 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3262964

A Semantic-Preserving Scheme to Trajectory Synthesis Using Differential Privacy

2023· article· en· W4361798894 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoxin Du, Hui Zhu, Yandong Zheng, Rongxing Lu, Fengwei Wang, Hui Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDifferential privacyComputer scienceTrajectoryData publishingFeature (linguistics)PublicationData miningTheoretical computer scienceSemantics (computer science)Scheme (mathematics)Information retrievalPublishingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the ubiquity of Internet of Things, location-based service (LBS) providers have collected huge volumes of individuals’ trajectories, which are valuable for some applications, e.g., store location choosing for merchants. However, directly publishing raw trajectories to applications may violate individuals’ data privacy and lead to unexpected loss. Although many trajectory synthesis methods under differential privacy have been proposed to privately publish trajectories data, they cannot sufficiently preserve the semantic information of trajectories. Aiming at this issue, in this article, we introduce a semantic-preserving scheme to synthesize trajectories for publishing under differential privacy. Specifically, we first design a hierarchical graphical model (HGM) to capture the semantic feature of trajectories. Then, we propose a metric, named the correlation score, to measure the relationship between two locations, which can well capture the geographic feature of trajectories. After that, we propose a private trajectory synthesis algorithm by first adding Laplace noises to the extracted features and then synthesizing trajectories based on the noisy features and the Markov chain theory. Privacy analysis demonstrates that our scheme can protect the privacy of trajectories. In addition, performance evaluation illustrates that our synthetic trajectories maintain good utility semantically and geographically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0330.043
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207