MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GEOGLIFOS HISPANICOS DEL DESIERTO DE ATACAMA (NORTE DE CHILE)

2022· article· es· W4361799047 on OpenAlexaff
Luis Briones Morales, Persis B. Clarkson

Bibliographic record

VenueDiálogo andino · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLatin American history and culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ResumenUn examen prospectivo entre el valle de Camarones y el río Loa (norte de Chile) ha permitido identificar una red de rutas caravaneras prehispánicas internodales.Se asocian a geoglifos vinculados con las comunidades locales del periodo Intermedio Tardío (900-1450 d.C.).Hasta ahora no se habían registrado temas hispánicos complejos.Al respecto se presenta un sitio multicomponente con diseños vinculados a la cultura regional Pica-Tarapacá, inca e hispánica.Representa estilos prehispánicos de caravanas de llamas (Lama sp.) con otros motivos recurrentes durante el Desarrollo Regional, intervenidos con intrusiones incaicas e hispánicas.Entre varias hipótesis plausibles se interpreta como una representación del traslado de esclavos afrotarapaqueños.Fueron realizados con técnicas extractivas derivadas del periodo prehispánico junto a la ruta longitudinal preincaica que unía los oasis de Tarapacá -Pica -Huatacondo -Chug Chug/Quillagua y Calama, mantenida en uso aun durante el periodo histórico-colonial a lo largo del desierto central de Atacama.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiálogo andinoSame topicLatin American history and cultureFrench-language works237,207