MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361801290 · doi:10.33012/navi.581

Real-Time Ionosphere Prediction Based on IGS Rapid Products Using Long Short-Term Memory Deep Learning

2023· article· en· W4361801290 on OpenAlex
Jianping Chen, Yang Gao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNAVIGATION Journal of the Institute of Navigation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGNSS applicationsComputer scienceIonosphereTerm (time)Real-time computingRemote sensingGlobal Positioning SystemGeologyGeophysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Abstract</h3> High-precision ionospheric corrections are essential for precise positioning using low-cost single-frequency GNSS receivers. Although Real-Time Global Ionosphere Maps (RT-GIMs) are available from the International GNSS Service (IGS), their ionospheric predictions continue to rely on networks of globally-distributed GNSS stations and real-time data links. In this paper, we develop a regional real-time ionospheric prediction model based on a long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning method. Because the GIMs from the IGS are used as prediction bases, the requirement for real-time GNSS data-links is eliminated. A comparison of the ionospheric predictions generated over 24 hours by the proposed method and the IGS GIM revealed a prediction accuracy root mean square error of 0.8 TECU. These results suggest that the proposed model may be suitable for use in real-time applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it