MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4361826498 · doi:10.2196/preprints.47438

A Novel Virtual OSCE Preparation Tool to Enhance Medical Education: Development and Usability Study (Preprint)

2023· preprint· en· W4361826498 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ayma Aqib, Faiha Fareez, Elnaz Assadpour, Tubba Babar, Andrew Kokavec, Edward Wang, Thomas Lo, Jean‐Paul Lam, Chris Smith

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObjective structured clinical examinationMedical educationUsabilityInterviewVirtual patientMedical diagnosisClinical PracticePsychologyMedicineComputer scienceFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND A significant component of Canadian medical education is learning how to approach the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). The OSCE assesses skills imperative to good clinical practice, such as patient communication, clinical decision-making and medical knowledge. Despite the widespread implementation of this examination across all academic settings, very few preparatory resources currently exist that cater specifically to Canadian medical students. The MonkeyJacket is a novel, open-access online application built with the goal of providing medical students in Canada with an accessible and representative learning tool for the OSCE. OBJECTIVE The goal of this research study was to analyze the utility of this novel platform, with the intention of releasing an open-access version for all medical students in the near future. METHODS MonkeyJacket was developed to allow Canadian medical students the opportunity to practice their clinical examination skills with their peers using one centralized platform. The OSCE cases included in the application were developed using the Medical Council of Canada (MCC) guidelines to ensure their applicability to a Canadian setting. There are currently 75 cases covering five specialties, including cardiology, respirology, gastroenterology, neurology, and psychiatry. RESULTS The MonkeyJacket application is an online platform that allows medical students to practice clinical decision-making skills in real time with their peers by simply sharing a link. Through this application, students can practice patient interviewing, clinical reasoning, developing different diagnoses, formulating a management plan, and can receive both qualitative and quantitative feedback. Each clinical case is associated with an ‘assessment checklist’ and incorporates audio and video recording that is accessible to students after practice sessions to promote personal improvement through self-reflection. CONCLUSIONS The development of the MonkeyJacket application will transform the ways in which Canadian medical students practice for OSCEs. Currently, limited resources exist that are accessible in cost, remote in nature, and specific to MCC. By providing students with relevant clinical cases, assessment checklists, and the ability to review their own performance, MonkeyJacket fills the aforementioned gaps in medical education by introducing a unique and innovative way for medical learners to develop their patient interviewing and clinical reasoning skills. The widespread implementation of this application will promote a more competent medical workforce which will benefit the most important stakeholder in medicine - the patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovations in Medical Education→French-language works237,207→