MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Vision of IoT, 5G and 6G Data Processing: Applications in Climate Change Mitigation

2022· article· en· W4361829773 on OpenAlexaff
Soukaina El Maachi, Rachid Saadane, Mohamed Wahbi, Abdellah Chehri, Abdelmounaim Badaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeInternet of ThingsGlobal warmingPlan (archaeology)Sustainable developmentEnvironmental resource managementBiosphereEnvironmental planningBusinessEnvironmental scienceComputer sciencePolitical scienceComputer securityGeographyOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Earth is becoming increasingly hot as we experience more record-breaking heat waves, ice melting, and an increase in average temperatures. The repercussions of global climate change are becoming increasingly evident, which led to climate change being named the “greatest global health threat of the twenty-first century.” As a result, the international community established an ambitious plan for going green, promoting human development, and preserving the biosphere by adopting the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals. As a result, international cooperation efforts have been increasingly put forward. This paper presents ways in which the Internet of Things could benefit the current efforts toward climate change mitigation endeavors. We discuss state-of-the-art projects that have been established worldwide to use recent advancements in 5G/6G technologies and IoT to monitor, model, and combat the impacts of global climate change on agriculture, water resources depletion, and coastal erosion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207