MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361859063 · doi:10.1162/jinh_r_01924

<i>Warfare and Logistics along the US-Canadian Border during the War of 1812</i> by Christopher Dishman

2023· article· en· W4361859063 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Reda

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpanish Civil WarPreparednessNarrativeVulnerability (computing)Argument (complex analysis)Political scienceHistoryVietnam WarState (computer science)LawMedicineComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drawing from a wide array of archival and secondary sources, Dishman’s analysis of the War of 1812 takes a close look at the combat along the United States–Canadian border. His focus is on the military dimension of the war, more specifically the logistical challenges faced by the two combatants. Dishman’s central argument is that the key factor in the fighting was the difficulties that both sides faced in moving men and materials into the Great Lakes border region on a reliable and timely basis. The British had a long, horizontal supply line stretching from the St. Lawrence valley westward through the Great Lakes and western Ontario. The vulnerability of this line was obvious to American strategists, but it was never fully severed due to the chronic manpower and supply problems that Americans faced, caused chiefly by the lack of roads in the region.Dishman’s close look at a specific theater of the war and the logistical problems intrinsic to the region is both the strength and weakness of the book. The well-written and nicely paced narrative makes a clear contribution to an understanding of the war for scholars with a foundation in this field. Whereas historians often emphasize the lack of American preparedness for the war and the poor performance of its aging generals, Dishman instead argues convincingly that despite those points having some validity, those conditions were not determinative in the Americans’ overall failure to successfully invade Upper Canada and sever its supply lines. He gives the Americans credit, however, for holding their own in the ongoing naval struggle for Lake Ontario and Lake Erie, based on an effective ship-building program and good leadership from officers such as Commodore Oliver Perry. He also gives credit to the British military leaders whose actions were heavily constrained by the tenuousness of the long supply lines that, in some sense, led all the way back to England.The book provides a detailed and compelling story of the thrust and parry of two foes making the best of relatively poor military situations. The British and Americans traded victories and defeats, but none were conclusive enough to change the basic equation of the wider war. Fighting in the United States–Canadian borderland theater ultimately resulted less in a stalemate than in a rough equilibrium that had much to do with negotiators in Europe choosing to settle the entire conflict as essentially a draw.The limitation in Dishman’s approach is the absence of much in the way of political or cultural background. He touches briefly on Americans’ aversion to a standing army and to federal taxes as hindrances to the cause, along with the outright refusal of most state militias to cross state borders or the Canadian border. More discussion about these issues, as well as about the Republican–Federalist divide and the economic differences between U.S. states and regions would have helped to establish the context for the fighting at the border. In the same vein, Dishman underserves the Native Americans involved. He mentions them but does not adequately cover their specific connection to the war and the significance of their betrayal by their British allies. In contrast, Dishman’s recurring references to the demands that the Napoleonic wars placed on the British military demonstrate the effectiveness of widening the scope of a significant, though relatively narrow, frame of analysis.The War of 1812 is famously misunderstood and much-maligned, certainly in the U.S. and even more in the European historical literature. This monograph argues persuasively for the importance of long and tenuous supply lines, certainly not a glamorous topic but a useful one for scholars of this period, demonstrating that this war was anything but short, insignificant, or dull.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Interdisciplinary HistorySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207