<i>Heteroconium chaetospira</i>, a dark septate root endophyte allied to the Herpotrichiellaceae (Chaetothyriales) obtained from some forest soil samples in Canada using bait plants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During an extended search in Western Canada for fungal root endophytes useful as biocontrol agents against soil-borne pathogens, we isolated Heteroconium chaetospira, as well as Phialocephala fortinii or similar taxa, from seven samples of forest soil using herbaceous seedlings of four different species (i.e., barley, Chinese cabbage, eggplant, and melon) as bait plants. Our results support a previous observation that eggplant is a particularly effective species for baiting H. chaetospira from soil and confirm the ability of this fungus to grow as an endophyte in the roots of axenically reared host plants. Cultural characters show that this species is similar to P. fortinii and other melanized fungi in the dark septate endophyte (DSE) group (e.g., Leptodontidium orchidicola, P. sphaeroides, and Cadophora finlandica) in that it produces darkly pigmented colonies on agar media. Heteroconium chaetospira differs from P. fortinii and other melanized members of the Leotiomycetes in the DSE group in that its conidia are fusiform and develop in blastic acropetal chains. Heteroconium chaetospira is phylogenetically distant from most DSE taxa because DNA sequences for the nuclear small subunit (SSU) ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) indicate that the taxon is affiliated with the Herpotrichiellaceae of the Chaetothyriales rather than with the Leotiomycetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".