MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361859976 · doi:10.55365/1923.x2023.21.25

Development of Innovative Intrepreneurship in Context of European Integration

2023· article· en· W4361859976 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Economics and Finance · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipCreativityContext (archaeology)Plan (archaeology)BusinessComputer scienceManagement scienceKnowledge managementProcess managementPolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of "innovative development of entrepreneurship" is analyzed, substantiated and researched in the article.The article examines the theoretical aspects of innovative entrepreneurship formation in the conditions of European integration.The essence of "innovation" concept is also defined.The concept of "innovations" is considered on the example of principles.The relationship between the main concepts of innovatics is analyzed as well.It was determined the impact on the innovative development of entrepreneurship in the conditions of European integration.The concept of "startup" was studied and the main characteristics of a startup are defined.The article presents the improvement of innovative entrepreneurship development in the conditions of European integration.It has been studied that in the conditions of European integration, an algorithm forming strategy for innovative development of entrepreneurship has been formed, which reflects the main stages of development.The concept of "cluster" is defined.The priority areas of ensuring the improvement of innovative development of entrepreneurship have been analyzed.It was examined the processes of ensuring the development plan of innovative entrepreneurship in the article.It was also determined that technological innovations are the basis of the innovative development of entrepreneurship.The main goal of the work is to substantiate and deepen the theoretical foundations of innovative development of entrepreneurship in the conditions of European integration.The following research methods are used in the article: methods of analysis and formalization; the method of synthesis is a combination of the parts obtained during the analysis into a whole (the method of synthesis in scientific creativity can take different forms depending on the properties of the investigated object of "innovative development", "innovative development of entrepreneurship"); method of logical generalization (when defining and formulating the scientific foundations of innovative development of entrepreneurship); abstract-logical method (for theoretical generalization of research and conclusions); the method of observation (when determining the features of the development of innovative entrepreneurship); methods of induction and deduction (clarification of the subject and formulation of the research problem).Scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists on the issues of the development of innovative entrepreneurship, textbooks, Internet resources, reporting data of industrial enterprises, special scientific and other sources were used as a research basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it