Development of Innovative Intrepreneurship in Context of European Integration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of "innovative development of entrepreneurship" is analyzed, substantiated and researched in the article.The article examines the theoretical aspects of innovative entrepreneurship formation in the conditions of European integration.The essence of "innovation" concept is also defined.The concept of "innovations" is considered on the example of principles.The relationship between the main concepts of innovatics is analyzed as well.It was determined the impact on the innovative development of entrepreneurship in the conditions of European integration.The concept of "startup" was studied and the main characteristics of a startup are defined.The article presents the improvement of innovative entrepreneurship development in the conditions of European integration.It has been studied that in the conditions of European integration, an algorithm forming strategy for innovative development of entrepreneurship has been formed, which reflects the main stages of development.The concept of "cluster" is defined.The priority areas of ensuring the improvement of innovative development of entrepreneurship have been analyzed.It was examined the processes of ensuring the development plan of innovative entrepreneurship in the article.It was also determined that technological innovations are the basis of the innovative development of entrepreneurship.The main goal of the work is to substantiate and deepen the theoretical foundations of innovative development of entrepreneurship in the conditions of European integration.The following research methods are used in the article: methods of analysis and formalization; the method of synthesis is a combination of the parts obtained during the analysis into a whole (the method of synthesis in scientific creativity can take different forms depending on the properties of the investigated object of "innovative development", "innovative development of entrepreneurship"); method of logical generalization (when defining and formulating the scientific foundations of innovative development of entrepreneurship); abstract-logical method (for theoretical generalization of research and conclusions); the method of observation (when determining the features of the development of innovative entrepreneurship); methods of induction and deduction (clarification of the subject and formulation of the research problem).Scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists on the issues of the development of innovative entrepreneurship, textbooks, Internet resources, reporting data of industrial enterprises, special scientific and other sources were used as a research basis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".