Bibliographic record
Abstract
During my practicum at Dragonstone Counselling, I had the privilege to explore and learn how practitioners both embody and incorporate holistic and alternative expressive artbased modalities that attend to the mind, body, and spirit of those accessing service in a clinical counselling practice setting. Additionally, I explored more traditional counselling approaches, such as Rogerian client-centred and feminist modalities, and how these can be paired with spiritual, holistic and art-based approaches to wellness. Throughout my studies, I uncovered a keen interest in understanding wellness and healing, with a particular focus on understanding methods of wellness that empower and help neurodivergent individuals with ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) as well as the 2SLGBTQIA+ (Two-Spirit, lesbian, bisexual, gay, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual/aromantic/agender) community to resist and unlearn our internalized oppressions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.025 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.075 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.024 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".