Bibliographic record
Abstract
La importancia de la práctica reflexiva y su impacto en el quehacer diario de los profesionales de la educación es el punto de partida de este artículo. En él se presentan dos materiales creados por el Grup de Recerca en Educació Moral (GREM) que pretenden contribuir a generar procesos de reflexión individuales y colectivos relacionados con el aprendizaje servicio (ApS). El primer material consiste en una Rúbrica para la autoevaluación y la mejora de los proyectos de ApS, estructurada en doce dinamismos pedagógicos que evolucionan en cuatro niveles de dominio. Su principal utilidad es favorecer el análisis y el debate de las características pedagógicas de las experiencias de ApS. El segundo material es el Mapa de los valores del aprendizaje-servicio, en el que se propone un inventario de los valores más presentes en esta práctica. Su aplicación permite a los equipos educativos tomar conciencia de los valores que se activan en cada proyecto y en la medida de lo posible incentivar su presencia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".