MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361982502 · doi:10.1344/ridas2022.14.4

Herramientas para la mejora de los proyectos de aprendizaje-servicio

2022· article· es· W4361982502 on OpenAlex
Xus Martín

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRIDAS Revista Iberoamericana de Aprendizaje y Servicio · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsAdidas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La importancia de la práctica reflexiva y su impacto en el quehacer diario de los profesionales de la educación es el punto de partida de este artículo. En él se presentan dos materiales creados por el Grup de Recerca en Educació Moral (GREM) que pretenden contribuir a generar procesos de reflexión individuales y colectivos relacionados con el aprendizaje servicio (ApS). El primer material consiste en una Rúbrica para la autoevaluación y la mejora de los proyectos de ApS, estructurada en doce dinamismos pedagógicos que evolucionan en cuatro niveles de dominio. Su principal utilidad es favorecer el análisis y el debate de las características pedagógicas de las experiencias de ApS. El segundo material es el Mapa de los valores del aprendizaje-servicio, en el que se propone un inventario de los valores más presentes en esta práctica. Su aplicación permite a los equipos educativos tomar conciencia de los valores que se activan en cada proyecto y en la medida de lo posible incentivar su presencia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it