El aprendizaje-servicio universitario: valor pedagógico y valor social
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gracias a la labor y esfuerzos de numerosas personas en diferentes países, entre quienes se encontraba la profesora Laura Rubio Serrano de la Universitat de Barcelona, la presencia del aprendizaje-servicio (ApS) en la docencia universitaria es una constante en la actualidad. El ApS destaca por unir a su valor pedagógico, el social y solidario. Se presentas tres experiencias de implementación, diversas en cuanto a grados, cursos y carácter de las asignaturas, y ofrece indicadores del valor pedagógico y del valor social del ApS en la educación superior, que se extienden a los tres agentes implicados (estudiantes, profesionales de las entidades participantes y profesorado universitario). De esta manera, se consigue cumplir con las tres misiones de las universidades: formación de futuros profesionales, construcción de conocimiento y responsabilidad social. Ofrecer, desde las universidades, una formación situada en la práctica profesional y que intenta dar respuesta a necesidades sentidas por la sociedad quizá no sea posible solamente a través de la participación en proyectos de ApS, pero no cabe duda de que hacerlo mediante esta metodología es garantía de consecución y de calidad
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".