Consideraciones y argumentos a favor de la institucionalización del aprendizaje-servicio en la educación superior y la universidad
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El artículo plantea un conjunto de consideraciones sobre la incorporación del aprendizaje-servicio (ApS) en la educación superior valorando su conveniencia y propone argumentos a favor de su institucionalización. Se analiza el sentido de la institucionalización de prácticas innovadoras en aprendizaje y docencia en general concretando este análisis en el caso de las innovaciones derivadas de la perspectiva ApS. Se defiende que la institucionalización de tales prácticas debe suponer una transformación sistémica que afecta a diferentes dimensiones de la institución y se proponen diferentes argumentos a su favor. Por último, se formulan cuatro breves consideraciones para huir de algunas concepciones ingenuas o consecuencias indeseadas sobre lo que en ocasiones se entiende por institucionalización
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it