MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362001783 · doi:10.18800/9786124146275.001

De «audiencias» a archivos : hacia una comprensión del cambio en los sistemas de registro de la información en los Andes

2013· book-chapter· es· W4362001783 on OpenAlexaff
John R. Topic

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLatin American history and culture
Canadian institutionsSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabajo sigue el recorrido del desarrollo y la transformación de las tecnologías de la información empleadas en los Andes durante casi mil años, lapso que incluye la transición desde los sistemas indígenas de registro de información hasta el predominio de la escritura alfabética. En la actualidad, es frecuente concebir los cambios en las tecnologías de la información de manera progresiva, es decir, como la actualización de un sistema más antiguo por otro mejor, con mayores capacidades y funciones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.032
Scholarly communication0.0210.013
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLatin American history and cultureFrench-language works237,207