Evaluating Photopheresis Regimens for Advanced CTCL: The Role of the SARS‐CoV‐2 Pandemic—A Single‐Center Retrospective Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an established, safe, and effective treatment for cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma (CTCL). There is no published literature reviewing the clinical efficacy of ECP at varying frequencies or the ideal duration of therapy. The SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic necessitated a reduced frequency of ECP for patients with CTCL at our center. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with CTCL receiving ECP at the Penn Dermatology Photopheresis Service (PDPS) on March 1, 2020, and followed up their course until January 31, 2021. Our retrospective cohort study suggests that one day of ECP with extending duration between treatments can be considered an alternative maintenance regimen in appropriate patients with stable disease on concomitant multimodality immunomodulatory therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it