MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4362449590 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad974

Analytical models of rotating magnetized gas filaments

2023· article· en· W4362449590 on OpenAlexafffund
William Grafton, Jason Fiege, Kelvin Au, Adam Rogers

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsVirial theoremRADIUSDifferential rotationAstrophysicsToroidKinetic energyMolecular cloudMagnetic fieldAtomic physicsPlasmaClassical mechanicsStarsQuantum mechanicsGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Several rotating molecular gas filaments with striking helical morphology have been observed in the Central Molecular Zone, including the Double Helix Nebula (DHN), the Galactic Centre Tornado (GCT), and the Pigtail Nebula (PTN). We present a model for isothermal, rotating, magnetized, pressure-truncated, non-self-gravitating filaments, as a model for these objects. We find a novel analytical stationary solution for these molecular tornadoes by assuming a propagating torsional Alfvén wave resulting in balance between toroidal magnetic stress and centrifugal force, as well as constant flux to mass ratio for the poloidal magnetic field. Our model allows for differential rotation and the density profile for the stationary solution goes asymptotically as r−1 at large radius for a special case where the flux to mass ratios for the poloidal and toroidal fields are constant inside the filament. We subject our stationary solutions to a virial analysis and show that they satisfy the virial equation for cylindrical symmetry $2\mathcal {K}+\mathcal {M}=0$. Finally, we estimate the ratio of gravitational potential energy per unit length, $\mathcal {W}$, to the bulk kinetic energy per unit length, $\mathcal {K}_0$, and calculate $|\mathcal {W}|/\mathcal {K}_0$ for the DHN, GCT, and PTN. Our estimates suggest that self-gravity is negligible in the DHN and the PTN and GCT are at most weakly self-gravitating. We also briefly address an application of our model to filamentary plasma lenses in the interstellar medium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→