MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362453037 · doi:10.1145/3590768

MEDUSA: A Multi-Resolution Machine Learning Congestion Estimation Method for 2D and 3D Global Routing

2023· article· en· W4362453037 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Tsing Hua UniversityChinese University of Hong KongUniversity of Hong Kong
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkRouterRouting (electronic design automation)Network congestionReal-time computingComputer networkArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Routing congestion is one of the many factors that need to be minimized during the physical design phase of large integrated circuits. In this article, we propose a novel congestion estimation method, called MEDUSA , that consists of three parts: (1) a feature extraction and “hyper-image” encoding; (2) a congestion estimation method using a fixed-resolution convolutional neural network model that takes a tile of this hyper-image as input and makes accurate congestion predictions for a small region of the circuit; and (3) a sliding-window method for repeatedly applying this convolutional neural network on a layout, thereby producing higher-resolution congestion maps for arbitrarily large circuits. The proposed congestion estimation approach works with both 2D (collapsed) and 3D global routing. Using both quantitative metrics and qualitative visual inspection, congestion maps produced with MEDUSA show better accuracy than prior estimation techniques. Global routers typically use estimation techniques during their first router iteration and then switch to using actual congestion information extracted from the intermediate router solutions. Experimental results within the same global router infrastructure show a significant impact on quality after the first routing iteration; other estimation techniques result in an average of 22% to 54% higher initial overflow counts. This initial quality improvement carries through to the final global routing solution, with other estimation techniques needing up to 5% more routing iterations and up to 3× more runtime, on average. Compared with other global routers, MEDUSA achieves comparable wire length results and lower total overflow counts (more legal global routing solutions) and is typically faster.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it