Modified Ion Source for the Improved Collisional Activation of Protein Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The analysis of large molecules is challenging, as they often have salts and adducts retained through the electrospray process, which increase the observed mass and compromise the achievable mass resolution. Mild collisional activation has been shown to be very effective for the removal of adducts and increases both measurement accuracy and mass resolution of large (>100 kDa) protein complexes. Collisionally activated protein ions are more completely desolvated due to the increased number of collisions when trapped following activation. A short square quadrupole maintained at 300 mTorr by a mechanical pump was added between the ion funnel and transmission quadrupole. This configuration and operation effectively removed adducts from the 800 kDa tetradecamer GroEL as well as fragmented smaller protein complexes like C-reactive protein. Due to the gas high pressure, ions of low size-to-charge ratio, such as those in charge reducing buffers, had low ejection efficiency. We show that segmenting the quadrupole rods greatly improves signal intensity for charge reduced GroEL D398A mutant compared to nonsegmented rods when operating at high pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".