MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362464199 · doi:10.1093/oxartj/kcad005

Photographic Power

2023· article· en· W4362464199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Diva Gujral

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford Art Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Photographic Power Get access Sigrid Lien and Hilde Wallem Nielssen (eds), Adjusting the Lens: Indigenous Activism, Colonial Legacies, and Photographic Heritage (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2021), 67 halftone reproductions, 322 pp., paperback £40 Diva Gujral Diva Gujral Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Oxford Art Journal, Volume 46, Issue 1, March 2023, Pages 141–145, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxartj/kcad005 Published: 31 March 2023 Article history Received: 21 December 2022 Revision received: 11 January 2023 Editorial decision: 31 January 2023 Accepted: 04 February 2023 Corrected and typeset: 31 March 2023 Published: 31 March 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford Art JournalSame topicPhotography and Visual CultureFrench-language works237,207