MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

BigBrain-MR: a new digital phantom with anatomically-realistic magnetic resonance properties at 100-µm resolution for magnetic resonance methods development

2023· article· en· W4362466462 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Cristina Sainz Martinez, Meritxell Bach Cuadra, João Jorge

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre d'Imagerie BioMédicaleCanadian Society of Endocrinology and MetabolismSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsImaging phantomMagnetic resonance imagingComputer scienceInterpolation (computer graphics)Image resolutionReal-time MRIHigh resolutionComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMedical physicsBiomedical engineeringPhysicsMotion (physics)RadiologyMedicineOpticsGeologyRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The benefits, opportunities and growing availability of ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for humans have prompted an expansion in research and development efforts towards increasingly more advanced high-resolution imaging techniques. To maximize their effectiveness, these efforts need to be supported by powerful computational simulation platforms that can adequately reproduce the biophysical characteristics of MRI, with high spatial resolution. In this work, we have sought to address this need by developing a novel digital phantom with realistic anatomical detail up to 100-µm resolution, including multiple MRI properties that affect image generation. This phantom, termed BigBrain-MR, was generated from the publicly available BigBrain histological dataset and lower-resolution in-vivo 7T-MRI data, using a newly-developed image processing framework that allows mapping the general properties of the latter into the fine anatomical scale of the former. Overall, the mapping framework was found to be effective and robust, yielding a diverse range of realistic "in-vivo-like" MRI contrasts and maps at 100-µm resolution. BigBrain-MR was then tested in three imaging applications (motion effects and interpolation, super-resolution imaging, and parallel imaging reconstruction) to investigate its properties, value and validity as a simulation platform. The results consistently showed that BigBrain-MR can closely approximate the behavior of real in-vivo data, more realistically and with more extensive features than a more classic option such as the Shepp-Logan phantom. Its flexibility in simulating different contrast mechanisms and artifacts may also prove valuable for educational applications. BigBrain-MR is therefore deemed a favorable choice to support methodological development and demonstration in brain MRI, and has been made freely available to the community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImageSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207