MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362470396 · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37472-2

All-fibre phase filters with 1-GHz resolution for high-speed passive optical logic processing

2023· article· en· W4362470396 on OpenAlexafffund
Saket Kaushal, A. Aadhi, Anthony Roberge, Roberto Morandotti, Raman Kashyap, José Azaña

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsXNOR gateComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)Electronic engineeringFiber Bragg gratingPhotonicsScalabilitySignal processingOptical filterOptical fiberLogic gateComputer hardwareTelecommunicationsMaterials scienceDigital signal processingOptoelectronicsEngineeringAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photonic-based implementation of advanced computing tasks is a potential alternative to mitigate the bandwidth limitations of electronics. Despite the inherent advantage of a large bandwidth, photonic systems are generally bulky and power-hungry. In this respect, all-pass spectral phase filters enable simultaneous ultrahigh speed operation and minimal power consumption for a wide range of signal processing functionalities. Yet, phase filters offering GHz to sub-GHz frequency resolution in practical, integrated platforms have remained elusive. We report a fibre Bragg grating-based phase filter with a record frequency resolution of 1 GHz, at least 10× improvement compared to a conventional optical waveshaper. The all-fibre phase filter is employed to experimentally realize high-speed fully passive NOT and XNOR logic operations. We demonstrate inversion of a 45-Gbps 127-bit random sequence with an energy consumption of ~34 fJ/bit, and XNOR logic at a bit rate of 10.25 Gbps consuming ~425 fJ/bit. The scalable implementation of phase filters provides a promising path towards widespread deployment of compact, low-energy-consuming signal processors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207