<sup>8</sup>Li βNMR studies of Epitaxial Thin Films of the 3D topological Dirac semimetal Sr<sub>3</sub>SnO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The inverse perovskite Sr3SnO is a 3D cubic Dirac semimetal with a very small energy gap[1]. Its unusual electronic structure confers a variety of novel properties, such as chiral topological surface states, and very strong itinerant electron orbital magnetism. Remarkably, when doped it also becomes superconducting[2]. In the lowest carrier density samples, the Fermi level lies close to the Dirac points, and orbital magnetism is maximal. Here we report the results of ion-implanted 8Li+ βNMR in Au-capped epitaxial thin films of Sr3SnO as a function of carrier content. In addition, we stop the 8Li in the Au overlayer to seek proximal evidence of the chiral surface state. In high magnetic field (6.55 T), we find remarkably little contrast in spin-lattice relaxation (SLR) between low carrier density Sr3SnO and the Au overlayer. In the inverse perovskite layer, 1/T 1 ∼ 0.14 s-1, slightly faster than Au at 300 K, while in the overlayer, there is a small but systematic enhancement in 1/T 1 compared to a control film of Au. The resonance in the Sr3SnO layer is broad with a long tail towards negative shift without resolved quadrupolar splitting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".