MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362475708 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp16323

A Holistic Approach to the Indigenous Torontonian’s Mental Health Inequity

2023· article· en· W4362475708 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Mark Labib

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthIndigenousDisadvantagePopulationHealth equitySocioeconomic statusMedicinePsychological interventionSocial determinants of healthGerontologyEnvironmental healthPsychologyPublic healthPsychiatryPolitical scienceNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prevalence of mental health disorders in Canada is at an all-time high, affecting approximately 6.7 million Canadians, making it the leading cause of disability in the country. This study focuses on the mental health situation in Toronto, one of Canada's biggest cities, and aims to identify the causes of frequent mental health visits by assessing the social determinants of health (SDH) related to mental health. The hypothesis of a correlation between the density of the Aboriginal population in Toronto and mental health prevalence visits is supported by numerous academic studies and prevalent factors. The long lasting trauma caused by residential schools impacts mental health through increased anxiety, depression, and poor relationships with caregivers. Additionally, the assimilation of the Aboriginal population has also caused a significant loss of socioeconomic status (SES). By placing them on reserves with limited financial support. Finally, epigenetics plays a significant role in understanding the intergenerational effects of historical trauma and its impact on the Aboriginal population. This study aims to harness the implications of these factors for social policy and advocacy as well as mental health promotion in Canada and other Anglo-settler nations. This study highlights the need for a sustainable solution to improve the mental health situation in Toronto. It calls for a two-pronged approach, including both prevention and treatment. Preventive measures include addressing the root causes of poor mental health, including the legacy of residential schools, economic disadvantage, and cultural discontinuity, while treatment should aim to provide access to culturally appropriate mental health services and support. By addressing the social determinants of health related to mental health and taking a holistic approach, it is possible to reduce the impact of mental health disorders in Canada and improve the well-being of all Canadians.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0220.018
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.012
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.266
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicHealth disparities and outcomesFrench-language works237,207