Cautery tool state detection using deep learning on intraoperative surgery videos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatment for Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) includes an excisional surgery to remove cancerous tissues, using a cautery tool to make burns along a defined resection margin around the tumor. Margin evaluation occurs post-surgically, requiring repeat surgery if positive margins are detected. Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry (REIMS) can help distinguish healthy and cancerous tissue but does not provide spatial information about the cautery tool location where the spectra are acquired. We propose using intraoperative surgical video recordings and deep learning to provide surgeons with guidance to locate sites of potential positive margins. Frames from 14 intraoperative videos of BCC surgery were extracted and used to train a sequence of networks. The first network extracts frames showing surgery in-progress, then, an object detection network localizes the cautery tool and resection margin. Finally, our burn prediction model leverages the effectiveness of both a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network and a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve to accurately predict when the surgeon is cutting. The cut identifications will be used in the future for synchronization with iKnife data to provide localizations when cuts are predicted. The model was trained with four-fold cross-validation on a patient-wise split between training, validation, and testing sets. Average recall over the four folds of testing for the LSTM and ROC were 0.80 and 0.73, respectively. The video-based approach is simple yet effective at identifying tool-to-skin contact instances and may help guide surgeons, enabling them to deliver precise treatments in combination with iKnife data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".