Attention based multi-instance learning for improved glioblastoma detection using mass spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is the most common and most lethal primary brain tumor in adults with a five-year survival rate of 5%. The current standard of care and survival rate have remained largely unchanged due to the degree of difficulty in surgically removing these tumors, which plays a crucial role in survival, as better surgical resection leads to longer survival times. Thus, novel technologies need to be identified to improve resection accuracy. Our study features a curated database of GBM and normal brain tissue specimens, which we used to train and validate a multi-instance learning model for GBM detection via rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry. This method enables real-time tissue typing. The specimens were collected by a surgeon, reviewed by a pathologist, and sampled with an electrocautery device. The dataset comprised 276 normal tissue burns and 321 GBM tissue burns. Our multi-instance learning model was adapted to identify the molecular signatures of GBM, and we employed a patient-stratified four-fold cross-validation approach for model training and evaluation. Our models demonstrated robustness and outperformed baseline models with an improved AUC of 0.95 and accuracy of 0.95 in correctly classifying GBM and normal brain. This study marks the first application of deep learning to REIMS data for brain tumor tissue characterization. This study sets the foundation for investigating more clinically relevant questions where intraoperative tissue detection in neurosurgery is pertinent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".