Feasibility of MRI-US registration in oropharynx for transoral robotic surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trans-Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is an alternative surgery technique used to treat head-and-neck cancer. Compared with conventional surgery, robot assistance allows surgeons to operate within areas with restricted access, such as the oropharynx, reducing the operative morbidity, risk of reconstructive surgery and improving patient outcomes. TORS is a challenging procedure, and intra-operative Ultrasound (US) has the potential to improve anatomy visualization to lessen the cognitive load on surgeons. To date, only intra-oral US has been used in exploratory studies, but intra-oral US can interfere with robot tools. In this study, we assess the feasibility of using transcervical 3D US with TORS: we propose to place the US probe on the patient’s neck to evaluate oropharyngeal anatomy intra-operatively. We also perform the first feasibility study of image registration between transcervical 3D US and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for the oropharynx. We collected 3D US and MRI data from five healthy volunteers and four patients with oropharyngeal cancer, and we use a semi-automatic MRI-US registration algorithm to estimate an affine transformation between the two image spaces. The average Target Registration Error (TRE) is 8.26 ± 7.41mm for healthy volunteers and 9.63 ± 5.91mm for patients, and our case studies show that image quality is the key factor for good registration. Our work shows that 3D transcervical US has the clinical potential to enable intraoperative oropharynx imaging and interventional MR guidance during TORS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".