MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362506941 · doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00458

Identification of Human Host Substrates of the SARS-CoV-2 M<sup>pro</sup> and PL<sup>pro</sup> Using Subtiligase N-Terminomics

2023· article· en· W4362506941 on OpenAlexafffund
Shu Luo, Eman W. Moussa, Joaquín López-Orozco, Alberto Felix-Lopez, Ray Ishida, Nawell Fayad, Erik Gomez‐Cardona, Henry Wang, Joyce A. Wilson, Tom C. Hobman, Olivier Julien

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Infectious Diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitute of Infection and ImmunityCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsProteasesProteolysisJurkat cellsProteaseBiologyRecombinant DNACleavage (geology)BiochemistryImmune systemEnzymeGeneticsT cellGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The recent emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in the human population has caused a global pandemic. The virus encodes two proteases, M pro and PL pro, that are thought to play key roles in the suppression of host protein synthesis and immune response evasion during infection. To identify the specific host cell substrates of these proteases, active recombinant SARS-CoV-2 M pro and PL pro were added to A549 and Jurkat human cell lysates, and subtiligase-mediated N-terminomics was used to capture and enrich protease substrate fragments. The precise location of each cleavage site was identified using mass spectrometry. Here, we report the identification of over 200 human host proteins that are potential substrates for SARS-CoV-2 M pro and PL pro and provide a global mapping of proteolysis for these two viral proteases in vitro. Modulating proteolysis of these substrates will increase our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 pathobiology and COVID-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Infectious DiseasesSame topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207