Multi-step carbon price forecasting using a hybrid model based on multivariate decomposition strategy and deep learning algorithms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate prediction of carbon price effectively ensures the stability of the carbon trading market and reduces carbon emissions . However, making accurate prediction is challenging because the carbon price is highly nonlinear and nonstationary due to complex influential factors. Thus, we propose a multifactorial hybrid forecasting framework, ET-MVMD-LSTM, to integrate three advanced algorithms for a reliable multi-step ahead prediction of the carbon price. First, extremely randomized tree (ET) is used to determine the optimal input variables for the modeling to follow. Then, multivariate variational mode decomposition (MVMD) is executed to simultaneously decompose the screened input variables into relatively regular sub-modes, which reflect characteristics at different scales. Subsequently, long short-term memory (LSTM) with a stable forecasting ability is employed to model each mode individually to effectively extract the long-term trend and short-term fluctuation features. The final forecast is reconstructed by the ensemble of the predictions of all sub-modes. Last, systematical studies on two European Union Emissions Trading Scheme carbon price datasets indicate that the proposed ET-MVMD-LSTM framework outperforms several advanced baseline models in terms of accuracy and stability, which prove the framework is deemed promising and practical for carbon price prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".