Explicit Representation and Customized Fault Isolation Framework for Learning Temporal and Spatial Dependencies in Industrial Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Typically, industrial processes possess both temporal and spatial dependencies due to intravariable dynamics and intervariable couplings. The two dependencies have different manifestations, indicating diverse process characteristics. However, the existing methods fail to separate temporal and spatial information well, leading to inappropriate representation and inaccurate fault detection and isolation results. This study proposes an explicit representation and customized fault isolation framework to tackle temporal and spatial characteristics, so as to identify and locate anomalies affecting different dependencies. First, we design a double-level separation method for temporal and spatial information. In the first level, we construct two independent auto-encoding modules to extract temporal correlation and spatial graph structure in parallel. In the second level, we propose an information aliasing loss function to guild the two modules to distinguish between temporal and spatial characteristics, further facilitating information separation. By monitoring the explicit temporal and spatial statistics obtained by the two modules, spatiotemporal dependencies of anomalies can be determined for subsequent isolation. Furthermore, we propose a customized isolation strategy for anomalies in temporal and spatial characteristics. By quantifying changes in intravariable temporal dynamics and intervariable spatial graph structure individually, temporal impact and spatial propagation of faults can be finely characterized and isolated. Three examples are adopted to verify the performance of the proposed framework, including a numerical example, a real condensing system of the thermal power plant process, and the Tennessee Eastman benchmark process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".