MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4362523140 · doi:10.1684/vir.2011.7729

[Early phase of HHV6 infection: role of IE1 and IE2 proteins].

2007· article· en· W4362523140 on OpenAlexaff
Alexia Gravel, Andru Tomoiu, Louis Flamand

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTransactivationCell cycleVirologyGeneTranscription (linguistics)Virus latencyViral life cycleVirusTranscription factorViral replicationCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV6) is an opportunistic pathogen whose infection or reactivation is associated with diseases such as roseola, central nervous system disorders and organ transplant anomalies. Following its entry into the host cell, the virus utilizes the cellular machinery in order to transcribe its genes and insure the replicative cycle progression. HHV-6 can also latently persist in its host. Immediate-early proteins are rapidly expressed upon cell infection. In particular, IE1 and IE2 proteins play an important role in the establishment of infection. IE1 inhibits interferon-b transcription and may participate in the PML nuclear body aggregation induced by the viral infection. IE2 is a strong transactivator of multiple cell and viral promoters, and contributes to the initiation of the replicative cycle. In this review we have synthesized the current body of knowledge pertaining to the immediate early phase of HHV6 infection, including the role of immediate-early proteins in the replicative cycle and during latency, as well as that of the promoter who regulates their expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research→French-language works237,207→