MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4362542917 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-206

Abstract 206: Organoid models for predicting drug response in high grade serous and triple negative breast cancer

2023· article· en· W4362542917 on OpenAlexaff
Helen Mackay, Alla Buzina, Betty Li, Lilian T. Gien, David Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriple-negative breast cancerOrganoidMedicineBreast cancerCancerClinical trialOncologyOvarian cancerDrugChemotherapyInternal medicineCancer researchPharmacologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract While most patients with high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) respond to platinum-based chemotherapy, the response is rarely durable and recurrence almost inevitable. Women with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) urgently require effective therapeutic options. In women with HGSC and TNBC (with mutations in BRCA1/2) treatment with a Poly-ADP-ribose inhibitor (PARPi) has emerged as a standard of care. In models of HGSC and TNBC senescence may play a role in PARPi resistance with i Bcl-xL, a member of the Bcl-2 family of proteins, preventing apoptosis. Therefore, we have initiated a clinical trial whereby a PARPi and then, an inhibitor of Bcl-xL, Navitoclax, will be added to their course of treatment [NCT05358639]. Bcl-xL is only one of the five known inhibitors of apoptosis, at present we do not know in vivo how these will impact the efficacy of the PARPi/Navitoclax combination or if they will provide other targets for effective therapy. Our hypothesis is that patient derived organoids can be used as a pragmatic way to assess the efficacy of new drugs and to identify for individual patients which drug(s) and drug combinations are likely to be most efficacious. In particular, with reference to the clinical trial, identify for individual patients which Bcl-2 protein inhibitor will synergize with a PARPi to optimize treatment. Currently we are using organoids to test novel drugs and drug combinations and to develop biomarkers for HGSC and TNBC treatment response. A limitation to the use of organoids generated from biopsy samples is the lack of efficient and reliable experimental models that recapitulate in vitro patient tumors faithfully enough to facilitate translation to therapeutic decisions for patients. By adapting the relatively new technique of conditional reprogramming and combining it with novel hydrogel based synthetic ECM supports we can reproducibly generate HGSC and TNBC patient-specific tumor organoids models in two weeks with greater than 90% success. Organoids grown in 384 or 1536 well format are stained with novel non-toxic dyes and chemoresponses to drugs are inferred from automatically acquired 3D confocal image stacks using deep learning AI algorithms that enable automated analyses. Our data suggest that this approach captures the inherent heterogeneity of the disease, albeit local to the sampled site. We are now employing deep learning AI algorithms to enable automated analyses of 3D confocal image stacks of organoids and infer drug responses that will be compared to patient responses in the clinical trial. Citation Format: Helen J. MacKay, Alla Buzina, Betty Li, Lilian Gien, David Andrews. Organoid models for predicting drug response in high grade serous and triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 206.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→