MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362544178 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-3434

Abstract 3434: Selective glucocorticoid receptor modulation reveals a new role for CLEC10A in patients with solid tumors

2023· article· en· W4362544178 on OpenAlexaff
Nicoletta Colombo, Toon Van Gorp, Ursula A. Matulonis, Ana Oaknin, Rachel N. Grisham, Diane Provencher, Gini F. Fleming, Alexander Olawaiye, Erkut Borazanci, Russell Z. Szmulewitz, Subhagya A. Wadekar, Grace Mann, Hazel Hunt, Andrew E. Greenstein, Domenica Lorusso

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlucocorticoid receptorMedicineInternal medicineOncologyGlucocorticoidConfoundingBioinformaticsPharmacologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Selective glucocorticoid receptor (GR) modulators (SGRMs) represent a clinically validated mechanism of enhancing chemosensitivity and ameliorating the sequelae of hypercortisolism. While GRs reportedly control the expression of up to 20% of the human genome, specific targets of systemic GR antagonism in humans have yet to be identified. To address this question, we established a robust NanoString assay to measure candidate GR target genes in human blood and assessed them before and after therapy with the oral SGRM relacorilant, which selectively antagonizes the GR. In a randomized, controlled phase 2 study in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (NCT03776812), gene changes were assessed in 139 patients after treatment with relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel (NP) or NP alone. Using cross-validated random forest methods, a gene panel that accurately identified patients who had received relacorilant was established (ROC AUC 0.945 +/- 0.038). In 13 patients who crossed over from NP alone to relacorilant + NP, the genes in the panel were modified only after crossover (paired t-test P=0.0003), validating the gene panel’s ability to detect GR activity. The 4 most induced (LILRB4, FPR3, CLEC10A, CCR2) and 4 most suppressed (CDKN1C, TNFRSF17, BRIP1, PDK1) genes by relacorilant + NP vs. NP alone were selected and shown to be reliable indicators of GR activity across clinical studies in patients with pancreatic, prostate, and other solid tumors (NCT04329949, NCT03674814, NCT02762981), independent of concomitant medications or other confounders. CLEC10A (C-type lectin domain containing 10A) was identified as a particularly sensitive marker of GR activity as its expression was strongly suppressed by the GR agonist prednisone in healthy volunteers (paired t-test P<0.00010, NCT03335956) and strongly induced by relacorilant in patients with solid tumors (paired t-test P<0.00010). CLEC10A induction in blood by relacorilant was associated with longer overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer treated with relacorilant + NP (HR=0.39, Cox PH P=0.0135). High baseline tumor CLEC10A expression was also associated with longer overall survival in a large tumor ‘omics’ database (N=1656 ovarian tumors; HR 0.8, log-rank P=0.0008). CLEC10A and the genes correlated with its expression were found to be primarily expressed by a specific subset of dendritic cells, supporting previous reports that GR agonism can suppress dendritic cells. This analysis of CLEC10A and other identified GR target genes confirmed that systemic GR activity in patients with a range of solid tumors can be modulated pharmacologically, indicates that GR modulation may be associated with survival in patients with ovarian cancer, and provides new insights into the systemic functions of the GR in humans. Citation Format: Nicoletta Colombo, Toon Van Gorp, Ursula A. Matulonis, Ana Oaknin, Rachel N. Grisham, Diane Provencher, Gini F. Fleming, Alexander B. Olawaiye, Erkut H. Borazanci, Russell Z. Szmulewitz, Subhagya A. Wadekar, Grace Mann, Hazel J. Hunt, Andrew E. Greenstein, Domenica Lorusso. Selective glucocorticoid receptor modulation reveals a new role for CLEC10A in patients with solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3434.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicLung Cancer Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207