Application of the transfer learning method in multisource geophysical data fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Using multigeophysical exploration techniques is a common way for deep targets to be explored in complex survey areas. How to locate an unknown underground target using multiple datasets is a great challenge. The useful information in the multisource geophysical model can be extracted and fused with the help of data fusion, which also works well to correct the interpretation divergence brought on by expert experience, with image feature extraction being the key step in the fusion of the geophysical models. Traditionally, this method is often used for these kinds of geophysical images, but it significantly reduces the efficiency of feature extraction. As a result, we propose a novel method based on a transfer learning method to extract the features of multisource images. First, the ResNet50 network is used to extract the initial features of the images. Owing to the problems of feature redundancy and fuzzy features in initial features, Spearman and zero phase component analysis can be used to achieve feature reduction and enhancement, which can further improve the computational efficiency and fusion accuracy in fusion. Finally, the fusion image is obtained using fusion rules that we designed based on the current state. The algorithm's reliability is tested using field data from the Iliamna Volcano. The case study demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed strategy, which also offers a novel way to locate subsurface targets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".