MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362555260 · doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01921-1

Identification and properties of intense star-forming galaxies at redshifts z > 10

2023· article· en· W4362555260 on OpenAlexafffund
Brant Robertson, Sandro Tacchella, Benjamin D. Johnson, Kevin Hainline, Lily Whitler, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Ryan Endsley, Marcia Rieke, Daniel P. Stark, Stacey Alberts, Alan Dressler, Eiichi Egami, Ryan Hausen, G. H. Rieke, Irene Shivaei, Christina C. Williams, Christopher N. A. Willmer, Santiago Arribas, Nina Bonaventura, Andrew J. Bunker, Alex J. Cameron, Stefano Carniani, S. Charlot, Jacopo Chevallard, Mirko Curti, Emma Curtis-Lake, Francesco D’Eugenio, P. Jakobsen, Tobias J. Looser, Nora Lützgendorf, R. Maiolino, Michael V. Maseda, Tim Rawle, Hans‐Walter Rix, Renske Smit, Hannah Übler, Chris J. Willott, Joris Witstok, Stefi A. Baum, Rachana Bhatawdekar, Kristan Boyett, Zuyi Chen, Anna de Graaff, Michael Florian, Jakob M. Helton, Raphael E. Hviding, Zhiyuan Ji, Nimisha Kumari, Jianwei Lyu, Erica J. Nelson, Lester Sandles, Aayush Saxena, Katherine A. Suess, Fengwu Sun, Michael W. Topping, Imaan E. B. Wallace

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Astronomy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónGoddard Space Flight CenterMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónUniversity of California, Santa CruzIsaac Newton TrustNuclear Safety and Security CommissionScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research FoundationFondation MeracNational Science FoundationRoyal SocietyEuropean CommissionJohns Hopkins UniversityDanmarks GrundforskningsfondNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsRedshiftAstrophysicsGalaxyIdentification (biology)Star (game theory)PhysicsAstronomyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations265
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature AstronomySame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207