MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362562221 · doi:10.59126/v2i2a1

KIGALI AMENDMENT

2022· article· en· W4362562221 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
REYA ANU SONY

Bibliographic record

VenueTHE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMaritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmendmentMontreal ProtocolLawPolitical scienceConstitutional amendmentConstitutionGeographyOzoneOzone layerMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kigali Amendment is an amendment to the Montreal Protocol, which is an international agreement addressing the issue of ozone depletion. The Montreal Protocol has undergone numerous changes and amendments since it entered into force in 1998. The Kigali Amendment was the agreement's eighth such amendment, and it went into effect on the 1st of January 2019. The amendment's agreement was signed in Kigali, Rwanda's capital, the agreement and thus the amendment was given that name. The amendment's goal was to focus on reducing the consumption of hydrofluorocarbons (HCFs). This article will go over the history of the amendment, its features, impact, and place in the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTHE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTSSame topicMaritime Transport Emissions and EfficiencyFrench-language works237,207