MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362562400 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15955-8_27

Challenges for Contact Tracing and Tuberculosis Preventive Therapy Scale-up

2023· book-chapter· en· W4362562400 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntegrated science · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContact tracingTuberculosisScale (ratio)TracingMedicineComputer scienceGeographyInternal medicineCartographyPathologyOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tuberculosis preventive therapyTherapyPreventive (TPT) is a key strategy to eliminate tuberculosis (TB) by 2050. However, less than one-fifth of those needing TPT complete it because of the many losses through the complex tuberculosis infection (TBI) cascade of care. The largest and higher-risk populationsPopulation targeted for TPT are people living with HIV and contactsContact of patients with pulmonary TB. New tests to detect TBI and shorter and better-tolerated treatment regimensRegimentreatment to treat TBI have been incorporated by several countries in recent years, but the public healthPublic health impact of these advances is poor, as many other barriers are still pending. This chapter reviews the progress and bottlenecks for scaling up TPT to contactsContact worldwide. The perspective for new tests, treatments, and innovative approaches is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it