An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between the Housing Market and Macroeconomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between the housing market and the macroeconomy using macroeconomic variables, and housing price variables of South Korea from the first quarter of 1991 to the fourth quarter of 2021. In consideration of the macroeconomic transmission mechanism of housing price fluctuations, I built a VAR model with variables such as real GDP, private consumption, housing investment, private credit, policy interest rate, and housing transaction price. In respect of the impulse response, the result of the analysis showed that housing prices rose when real GDP, private consumption, housing investment, and private credit had risen. When housing prices rose, real GDP, prices, private consumption, private credit, and policy interest rates rose. As a result of forecast error variation decomposition, I found that the contribution of changes in housing prices to changes in each variable was not significant, but changes in real GDP and interest rates had a major impact on changes in housing prices. In the historical decomposition I performed, the contribution of policy interest rates to fluctuations in housing prices was also high. In particular, private credit was considerably affected by the rapid increase in housing prices in 2020. Based on the above results, I found that the increase in housing prices had a relatively long-term impact on the credit market but a poor impact on the real economy through increased consumption and housing investment, while I confirmed that the GDP and interest rates had a major effect on changes in housing prices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".