MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362576454 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-15446

QoS Performance Measurement Through SRv6 Network Programming for Smart City IoT Traffic

2022· dissertation· en· W4362576454 on OpenAlexaff
Sajib Kuri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceComputer networkScalabilityReliability (semiconductor)BenchmarkingThroughputInternet of ThingsIPv6Network performanceRouting (electronic design automation)Distributed computingThe InternetEmbedded systemWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Segment Routing over IPv6, also known as SRv6, is a modern networking solution that aims to improve the current Internet of Things (IoT) network's reliability, availability, and scalability.Performance measures are required to evaluate SRv6 behaviors or functions.The proposed work aims to provide real IoT traffic profiles to assess the performance of SRv6 behaviors.In particular, a three-module SRv6 programming model is proposed to measure the performance of SRv6 policy headend and endpoint behavior and ensure reliability and quality of service (QoS).Moreover, a novel finder algorithm for maximum receive rate (MRR) benchmarking is proposed, which can outperform existing techniques in terms of throughput/bandwidth performance while maintaining the same computational resources.Finally, implementation results provide insights into forwarding different IoT use-cases traffic based on the functional service requirements.That also ensures a higher usage level of existing IoT networks, minimizing the need for additional capacity and lowering network costs.I want to express my special gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Mohamed Ibnkahla, who allowed me to become a part of the Sensor Systems and Internet of Things (IoT) laboratory.I am incredibly grateful to him for providing me with academic and generous financial support throughout the road to finishing this thesis.I would also like to extend my warm thanks to Dr. Abdelrahman Eldosouky for his excellent suggestions and advice that have helped me to improve the quality of the thesis.My utmost thanks go to all the colleagues in our lab

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207