MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362576471 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15445

Constrained Geometric Optimization Problems

2023· dissertation· en· W4362576471 on OpenAlexafffund
Anthony D’Angelo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeodesicSimple polygonMathematicsSteiner tree problemPolygon (computer graphics)CombinatoricsLine segmentVoronoi diagramMonotone polygonGeometryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis we consider constrained geometric optimization problems. The first is a constrained version of the k-Steiner tree problem restricting the Steiner points to lie on a restricted set of curves. We solve the 1-Steiner tree problem in the Euclidean plane in optimal asymptotic time and space bounds when the Steiner point is constrained to lie on an input line. We then show how existing results can be used to generalize the result. The second problem is the smallest k-enclosing disc problem for a point set S contained in a simple polygon. In this problem we work with geodesic discs, meaning we use the geodesic distance function (i.e., the length of the shortest path). We present both a 2-approximation algorithm and an algorithm that finds the optimal radius for the smallest k-enclosing geodesic disc of a set of points inside a simple polygon. The last problem we consider is the smallest k-enclosing geodesic disc problem for a set of points in a simple polygon when the computed disc must be centred on an input chord of the polygon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.517
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207