MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362583116 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2747803/v1

Surgical Repair of Post Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Defect: A Retrospective Analysis of a Single Institution Experience

2023· preprint· en· W4362583116 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Shi, Jeremy Y. Levett, Haiyu LV, Guoan Zhang, Sha Wang, Tao Wei, Zhikun Wang, Xi Zhang, Dawei Feng, Kan Wang, Qiang Liu, Dominique Shum‐Tim

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersYakult Bio-Science Foundation
KeywordsMedicineVentriculotomyMyocardial infarctionPerforationSurgeryCardiologyConventional PCIInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction (MI) with a very high mortality, despite advances in surgical and circulatory support. The tremendous hemodynamic disturbance and the severely fragile myocardium render surgical repair a great challenge. The optimal time of surgical repair with or without circulatory support is still controversial. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to review our experience with early surgical repair of post-MI VSD in a single major cardiac institution in China. METHODS From January 2013 to October 2020, 9consecutive patients presented to our emergency department with a diagnosis of post-MI VSD. Among them, 8 were male, and the mean age was 58 ± 7years. The mean VSD size was 22.5 ± 5.7 mm. In all patients, an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)was inserted immediately after admission to cardiac surgery service. All patients were operated within one week of the rupture (range of surgery time 1 to 9 days post-VSR, mean 3.3 ± 2.9 days, and 4 within 24 hours. In 5 cases, the VSD was located superiorly, and 4 cases in the posterior septum. RESULTS The overall 30-day mortality was 11% (1/9). All patients underwent urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 5 additional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during VSD repair. There was no death in all 5 patients with anterior septal perforation. One patient with posterior septal perforation died in the operating room due to bleeding from the ventriculotomy site. Three survived patients were diagnosed witha small residual defect and mild left to right shunt post-repair. However, no further intervention was required, and patients remained asymptomatic (NYHA class II in 1 and III in 2). CONCLUSION In our experience, early surgical repair of post-MI VSD and concomitant coronary revascularization after hemodynamic stabilization and proper rescucitationcan beachieved with favorable survival and earlyoutcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicCardiac Structural Anomalies and RepairFrench-language works237,207