MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362595567 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-5124

Abstract 5124: The effect of lenvatinib in combination with chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors on tumor microenvironments in the mouse syngeneic tumor model

2023· article· en· W4362595567 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Kato, Yoichi Ozawa, Keito Adachi, Masahiko Kume, Yusuke Adachi, Y. Narita, Megumi Kuronishi, Junji Matsui, Akira Yokoi, Yasuhiro Funahashi

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsNutrasource
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLewis lung carcinomaLung cancerCancer researchCancerLenvatinibCombination therapyPharmacologyInternal medicineMetastasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Lenvatinib (LEN) is an oral, multiple-receptor, tyrosine kinase inhibitor that mainly targets vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptors. Combination therapy with LEN and everolimus is approved for people with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Combination therapy with LEN and pembrolizumab, an anti human-programmed-cell-death-1 (PD-1) antibody, is also approved for the treatment of people with advanced endometrial cancer and advanced RCC. In this study, we investigated the antitumor activity of LEN in combination with chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and explored the mechanism of action underlying these effects, in the mouse lung cancer syngeneic model. Methods: In the LL/2 mouse Lewis lung carcinoma model, LEN was dosed at either 3 or 10 mg/kg (orally; once daily for 2 weeks) with or without cisplatin 4 mg/kg (intravenously; 3 or 4 times, twice weekly) and with or without anti-PD-1 200 ug/head + anti cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) antibodies 10mg/kg (intraperitoneally; twice weekly). Functional blood vessels were evaluated in tumor microenvironments by injections of Hoechst 33342 (Hoechst) into the tail veins of mice. The Hoechst-stained area and expressions of angiogenesis/immune-cell-related molecules were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. Results: In this model, the combination treatment of LEN 3 mg/kg + cisplatin showed significant tumor growth inhibitory activity compared with each single agent without any marked body-weight loss. LEN 10 mg/kg + cisplatin did not show enhanced antitumor activity vs LEN 10 mg/kg as a single agent. IHC analysis using anti-CD31 antibody showed that LEN 3 mg/kg daily decreased microvessel density in tumors after 4 days. In addition, LEN 3 mg/kg daily for 4 days showed a trend toward an increase of the number of functional blood vessels stained with Hoechst in the tumor microenvironment compared with untreated controls. The combination of LEN 3 mg/kg + cisplatin + ICIs (anti-PD-1+anti-CTLA4) significantly inhibited tumor growth compared with combinations of cisplatin + ICIs. Conclusion: Our findings show that LEN 3 mg/kg enhances the antitumor activity of cisplatin in the LL/2 mouse Lewis lung carcinoma tumor model; and LEN 3 mg/kg + cisplatin + ICIs shows greater antitumor activity compared with cisplatin + ICIs. The results of the IHC analysis suggest that LEN 3 mg/kg inhibits angiogenesis. Conversely, LEN 3 mg/kg increases functional vessels in tumor microenvironments. This situation could enhance combination antitumor activity of chemotherapy, and also chemotherapy + ICIs combination treatment. Further analysis of the mechanism of action of LEN 3 mg/kg in combination with chemotherapy + ICIs is warranted. Citation Format: Yu Kato, Yoichi Ozawa, Keito Adachi, Masahiko Kume, Yusuke Adachi, Yudai Narita, Megumi Kuronishi, Junji Matsui, Akira Yokoi, Yasuhiro Funahashi. The effect of lenvatinib in combination with chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors on tumor microenvironments in the mouse syngeneic tumor model. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5124.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207