Current-Induced Spin Accumulation and Magnetoresistance in Chiral Semimetals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Weyl fermions possess the property of spin-momentum locking: the expectation value of the spin is parallel or antiparallel to the momentum at any given point in the Brillouin zone in the vicinity of a Weyl node. This is a direct consequence of the fact that Weyl nodes are monopoles of the Berry curvature, and in this sense an expression of the nontrivial Weyl electronic structure topology. Thanks to this property, an isolated Weyl node produces a large spin accumulation in response to a charge current, $\hbar/2$ per electron, similar to surface states of time-reversal invariant topological insulators. However, in bulk Weyl semimetals, the nodes must occur in pairs of opposite chirality and, when the nodes are at the same energy, the effect cancels out. Here we show that this cancellation is avoided in chiral semimetals, in which Weyl nodes of opposite chirality occur at different energies due to broken mirror symmetry. We find that the spin accumulation is maximized when the Fermi energy coincides with one of the nodes in a pair and reaches the same value as for an isolated node in this case. Moreover, we demonstrate the existence of a distinct magnetoresistance mechanism, closely related to this current-induced spin accumulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".