MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4362600332 · doi:10.1101/2023.04.03.535285

Chemo-phosphoproteomic profiling with ATR inhibitors berzosertib and gartisertib uncovers new biomarkers and DNA damage response regulators

2023· preprint· en· W4362600332 on OpenAlexafffund
Rathan S Jadav, Florian Weiland, Sylvie M. Noordermeer, Thomas Carroll, Yuandi Gao, Jianming Wang, Houjiang Zhou, Frédéric Lamoliatte, Iván Muñoz, Rachel Toth, Thomas Macartney, Fiona Brown, C. James Hastie, Constance Alabert, Haico van Attikum, Frank T. Zenke, John Rouse

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersInstitute for Digital Research and Education, University of California, Los AngelesMedical Research CouncilFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéMerck KGaA
KeywordsDNA damageBiologyHomologous recombinationDNA repairComputational biologyProteomicsBiomarkerKinasePhosphorylationDNACell biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ATR kinase protects cells against DNA damage and replication stress and represents a promising anti-cancer drug target. The ATR inhibitors (ATRi) berzosertib and gartisertib are in clinical trials for treatment of advanced solid tumours as monotherapy or in combination with genotoxic agents. However, the pharmacodynamic ATR biomarker phospho-CHK1 has shown limited sensitivity in for quantitative assessment of ATR activity in clinical trials. Therefore, better biomarkers are needed, and with this in mind we carried out quantitative phospho-proteomic screening for ATR biomarkers that are highly sensitive to berzosertib and gartisertib. Screening identified novel ATR-dependent targets in three broad classes: i) targets whose phosphorylation is highly sensitive to ATRi; ii) novel targets with known genome maintenance roles; iii) novel targets whose cellular roles are unclear, including SCAF1. We show that SCAF1 interacts with RNAPII in a phospho-dependent manner and suppresses homologous recombination in cells lacking the BRCA1 tumour suppressor. Taken together these data reveal potential new ATR biomarkers and new genome maintenance factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→