MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362601718 · doi:10.1289/ehp11989

Long-Term Exposure to Air Pollution and COVID-19 Vaccine Antibody Response in a General Population Cohort (COVICAT Study, Catalonia)

2023· article· en· W4362601718 on OpenAlexaff
Manolis Kogevinas, Marianna Karachaliou, Ana Espinosa, Ruth Aguilar, Gemma Castaño‐Vinyals, Judith García‐Aymerich, Anna Carreras, Beatriz Cortés, Vanessa Pleguezuelos, Kyriaki Papantoniou, Rocío Rubio, Alfons Jiménez, Marta Vidal, Pau Serra, Daniel Parras, Pere Santamaría, Luís Izquierdo, Marta Cirach, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Payam Dadvand, Kurt Straíf, Gemma Moncunill, Rafael de Cid, Carlota Dobaño, Cathryn Tonne

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Health Perspectives · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersEIT HealthAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIGeneralitat de CatalunyaAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaFundació Privada Daniel Bravo AndreuMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónCentres de Recerca de Catalunya
KeywordsInterquartile rangeMedicineVaccinationPopulationImmunologyCohortAntibodyAir pollutionEnvironmental healthBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Ambient air pollution has been associated with COVID-19 disease severity and antibody response induced by infection. OBJECTIVES: We examined the association between long-term exposure to air pollution and vaccine-induced antibody response. METHODS: ) using Effects of Low-Level Air Pollution: A Study in Europe (ELAPSE) models. We adjusted estimates for individual- and area-level covariates, time since vaccination, and vaccine doses and type and stratified by infection status. We used generalized additive models to explore the relationship between air pollution and antibodies according to days since vaccination. RESULTS: ). DISCUSSION: Exposure to air pollution was associated with lower COVID-19 vaccine antibody response. The implications of this association on the risk of breakthrough infections require further investigation. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11989.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Health PerspectivesSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207