MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362604439 · doi:10.1117/12.2654364

Skeletal modeling of the tricuspid valve via cylindrical parameterization

2023· article· en· W4362604439 on OpenAlexaff
Jared Vicory, Christian Herz, Maura Flynn, Alana Cianciulli, Patricia Sabin, Andras Lasso, Matthew A. Jolley, Beatriz Paniagua

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTricuspid valveComputer scienceCardiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome is a severe congenital heart defect requiring surgical intervention shortly after birth. The surgery is complex and often leads to complications requiring additional surgeries. Understanding the relationship between the structure of the tricuspid valve and functional complications could lead to more powerful diagnostic and treatment options. Because the tricuspid valve does not have spherical topology, many traditional methods for creating boundary-based or skeleton-based shape models that require spherical parameterization of an object are not applicable unless individual leaflets are independently parameterized and then merged in a multi-object model. Instead we propose to create skeletal models (s-reps) of the entire tricuspid valve structure using a cylindrical parameterization. We modify a traditional cylindrical parameterization approach by adaptively changing angle sampling based on landmarks to produce anatomically relevant correspondence across a population of objects. From this we derive s-reps which yield an improved shape space and classification performance compared with previous approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207